Cars driven by computer are dangerous. One can kidnap people with them and unmobilize them. Especially dangerous this is at times of war, especially at times of war covered with lies. I guess that Asians would be interested in such maneuvers. Especially stupid it is to change totally to computer aided cars, for example for environmental reasons. Manually working cars are by far the safest!
In the old times women were thought irrational and without a sense of space while men were good with maps and concretical observations and objective thinking. At those times men drove but women did not have a driver's lisence, they just sat without a proper sense of where they were going and a sense of distance, routes etc. Nowadays women too drive, almost all women have a driver's lisence in Finland and women also have a good clear head with good quality objective thinking, with no problem with maps and directions. In computer guided car all would be like passengers, so all would lose their objectively correct common sense. That is a major disaster, economically catastrophic tothe nation's economy.
lauantai 23. huhtikuuta 2016
torstai 21. huhtikuuta 2016
Finland is not like Sweden
There is a problem in Finland of foreigners thinking that Finland is like Sweden. It isn't. The Swedish are extremely imago oriented and do not care if things are rotten underneath, at least not if it is toward other nations, for example toward Finland. Finns are realism oriented and value honesty that does not allow any darker side sunderneath. The Swedish follow their culture robot like while Finns value freedom and moral, a grass-roots democracy according to the rule "Live and let otehrs live" which means roughly that one is allowed to be free and selfish like is positive for happy life, but not to mess with the lives of others, except fairly to prevent them from messing unfairly with the lives of others. Finns also value a lot each person's own objective understanding like common sense with a picture of the whole and honest fact communication about wisdom of life and about the workings of a society and about other subjects.
keskiviikko 6. huhtikuuta 2016
Total freedom is still easy to control
The Finnish rule "Live and let others live", see http://finnishskills.blogspot.fi/2012/10/live-and-let-others-live.html , means roughly that one is allowed to live freely and be selfish but not to disturb the lives of others (except fairly to prevent them from disturbing unfairly the lives of others). It gives the individuals in a society as much freedom as it is theoretically possible to give all fairly, i.e. one can live completely freely but not disturb the lives of others, which latter is needed for the freedom of others and for good life in the society.
Such almost total freedom may sound like a mess that is difficult to handle, but it aren't. If people can choose freely the main elements in their lives, they are satisfied with such life and not continually running away or making things in disguise. Typically people in the capital district of Finland where this rule was followed, had one job that they had chosen, that they happaned to like, so they always went to the same job and liked that. But those younger generation people who had not had the possibility to choose themselves, were constantly searching for new better alternatives. In addition the people had maybe two or three hobbies that they had chosen conpletely freely and not for some social reason, and so they liked their hobbies and spent free time in them or at home. In addition they did things generally considered good in the society, like going for a holiday trip countryside in the summer. Sometimes closest relationships in addition demanded them along to some hobby of their, like if they needed a car. But that is quite clearly it all, not difficult to handle. But those who did not follow the rule "Live and let others live" were more in arguments and caused more like a mess.
Such almost total freedom may sound like a mess that is difficult to handle, but it aren't. If people can choose freely the main elements in their lives, they are satisfied with such life and not continually running away or making things in disguise. Typically people in the capital district of Finland where this rule was followed, had one job that they had chosen, that they happaned to like, so they always went to the same job and liked that. But those younger generation people who had not had the possibility to choose themselves, were constantly searching for new better alternatives. In addition the people had maybe two or three hobbies that they had chosen conpletely freely and not for some social reason, and so they liked their hobbies and spent free time in them or at home. In addition they did things generally considered good in the society, like going for a holiday trip countryside in the summer. Sometimes closest relationships in addition demanded them along to some hobby of their, like if they needed a car. But that is quite clearly it all, not difficult to handle. But those who did not follow the rule "Live and let others live" were more in arguments and caused more like a mess.
lauantai 6. helmikuuta 2016
Who decides matters of major interest
It seems to me that each culture has it's own perspective and it's own major points that it considers it's own area or very important in the world, like sauna for Finland or the military defence of the Finnish Bay. It seems like a miracle that not so many in the workld are so interested in these matters, so it is much easier to have an opinion about them, to influence them like we dearly need. Even bigger miracle it is that if we take a look at some Wedish text about some familiar subject, it uses typically somewhat different concepts, somewhat different values and is overly interested in things connected with Sweden. So we feel somewhat alienated and think that let the Swedes decide Swedish things and let us have all these important Finnish things, let us Finns decide about them fully, so we will have well all the major matters of our world. And since other countires and their cultures are propably much further away from our own, maybe we are the ones that rule the world in these matters - partly bacause we tend to think with an objective picture of the whole world and morally too. Is it so that each culture "rules the world" in it's major questions if it does not intentionally tie them to the major interests of others (that is just some landscape that the culture happens to lives in)?!
lauantai 23. tammikuuta 2016
Jewish hat: who one listens to
I heard in the news that in some European country a Jewish teacher had been strongly critisised by the pupils who were non-Jewish, about the teacher wanting to wear a Jewish hat in school. I would agree with the pupils. As far as I know Jews value school and academical education overly much, to a degree which is not wise and which is very harmful for the quality of life and for the rights of individuals. So an overly pressuring teacher might want to wear a Jewish hat to show his extreme views. But wearing a such a hat is a question to which group one belongs to and whom one listens to. In school the teacher should belong to same group as the pupils, so as to listent o them, to make life good for them, to respoect their rights and their understanding, to heed their values, to be sensitive, to discuss with just them - and not only with some group not present, some group having strong unhuman views about education, some group not understanding that the teacher does not behave in civilized ways toward the students from another culture but with the ways of a stupid person who follows advices without regard for the true consequences, like a person who does not understand that other cultures have wisdom, that already the pupils have wisdom of another culture and an understanding of their own.
maanantai 18. tammikuuta 2016
About masses of immigrants in different countries
In Europe there are many new immigrants, say the news. I just saw in tv a part of a citizen group in Finland discussing new immigrants in their own area. That made me think of how immigrant problems are met different ways in different countries around the world and how that creates a large part of the ways in the countries.
One key is how arranged public discussions treat the subject, what ideas and views they seize, what answers they give and how skilled the people feel to be.
One major problem seemed to be lazy people stuck to habits with no sports ability being nervous about needing to aggressively defend the locals against gangs of foreign men. One suggested answer was secret police or calling police, but if one thinks that from the point of view of citizens seizing such answers, relying in them when they fear the unknown or something especially, that brings a police state like view,police state like dynamics, which have the problem of too much forcing, which is bad for rights of individuals and groups and not good for peace and harmony.
Often it is good if one has several strategies to rely on, so one can have police and secret service too but making too much emphazis on them is kind of clumsy because in reality you have all the people in the society living, discussing, feelings, reacting, forming bonds, learning about cultures and ways etc.
Typically in conflict it isn't good if you overdo it, and neither it is good if you underestimate your chances of affecting things. What is healthy in life in general is often good in conflict but not good if you are manipulated, spied or the like which is a problem to be treated and not just some side issue to be bypassed. The biggest matters in the socviety are typically what life is like to live in, what side effects and major effewcts things and choises have. It is good to discuss these human to human and in groups, read papers etc. And to choose wisely! Wise choise often defends but is liberal in allowing people space to live in.
Defending is good to have many tactics in the sma eytime. Like if you need to defend the community, you can discuss, you can be agile enough to defend your home, you can introduce ways that are good both for the locals and for the newcomers. You can tell about your country, since many things are often wise choises in the climate and geographical location of the culture, kind of unavoidable like the need for different professions.
One key is how arranged public discussions treat the subject, what ideas and views they seize, what answers they give and how skilled the people feel to be.
One major problem seemed to be lazy people stuck to habits with no sports ability being nervous about needing to aggressively defend the locals against gangs of foreign men. One suggested answer was secret police or calling police, but if one thinks that from the point of view of citizens seizing such answers, relying in them when they fear the unknown or something especially, that brings a police state like view,police state like dynamics, which have the problem of too much forcing, which is bad for rights of individuals and groups and not good for peace and harmony.
Often it is good if one has several strategies to rely on, so one can have police and secret service too but making too much emphazis on them is kind of clumsy because in reality you have all the people in the society living, discussing, feelings, reacting, forming bonds, learning about cultures and ways etc.
Typically in conflict it isn't good if you overdo it, and neither it is good if you underestimate your chances of affecting things. What is healthy in life in general is often good in conflict but not good if you are manipulated, spied or the like which is a problem to be treated and not just some side issue to be bypassed. The biggest matters in the socviety are typically what life is like to live in, what side effects and major effewcts things and choises have. It is good to discuss these human to human and in groups, read papers etc. And to choose wisely! Wise choise often defends but is liberal in allowing people space to live in.
Defending is good to have many tactics in the sma eytime. Like if you need to defend the community, you can discuss, you can be agile enough to defend your home, you can introduce ways that are good both for the locals and for the newcomers. You can tell about your country, since many things are often wise choises in the climate and geographical location of the culture, kind of unavoidable like the need for different professions.
keskiviikko 6. tammikuuta 2016
Nuclear bomb test
I just glanced the news and noticed that North Korea has made a
nuclear test of high caliber. That made me think of physicists who
plan such weapons. That is an area of objective thinking but hard work
which makes one wonder if they long for better life but see it far
away - too far for the whole globe? But according to the theory of
evolution humans are products of natural evolution which shaped us for
best capacity and shaped us to be satisfied with that kind of life, so
that happiness and best working condition are different sides of the
same kind of life, of natural healthy ways of living. For more in this
please see my free e-book http://www.angelfire.com/planet/paradisewins/TPBCASAW.pdf .
You might also be interested in Curing future threath scenarios
http://paratiisiteoria.
nuclear test of high caliber. That made me think of physicists who
plan such weapons. That is an area of objective thinking but hard work
which makes one wonder if they long for better life but see it far
away - too far for the whole globe? But according to the theory of
evolution humans are products of natural evolution which shaped us for
best capacity and shaped us to be satisfied with that kind of life, so
that happiness and best working condition are different sides of the
same kind of life, of natural healthy ways of living. For more in this
please see my free e-book http://www.angelfire.com/planet/paradisewins/TPBCASAW.pdf .
You might also be interested in Curing future threath scenarios
http://paratiisiteoria.
Tilaa:
Blogitekstit (Atom)