Terrorism and a solution

I read from the news that there have been by far most terrorist acts in Near East & North Africa (Arabs) and in South Asia. In South Asia and Africa the attacks have targeted on civilians, which sounds like the bombers wanted to complain about some cultural characteristic, about some quite common opinion in the society, about what people in practise support and why, meaning that they support something unwise.
Other targets were classified army which sounds like something like war business, government which sounds like they were somehow to stiff and mistaken, some fault in the government, and then companies which sounds like they had international business which affected wrong way over cultural borders.
To all these, I guess the Finnish problem solving method referred by the nonliteral words "Live and let others öive" would help, see http://finnishskills.blogspot.fi/2012/10/live-and-let-others-live.html . It makes people's behavious acceptaböle, by setting borders to how much they can affect and by allowing people to live freely without disturbing others. So it could solve the cultuyral problems. If it would be accepted as the highest rule in government, it would make government acceptable if applied wisely and with wisdom of life. It also settles disputes between countires, so it could calm down military situations to more peaceful yet having armies. And it would set borders to international companies' behaviour, making them acceptable.

Suomalaisesta versus ulkomaalaisesta lähestymistavasta

Brasilian
kesäolympialaisia silloin tällöin telkusta katselen, tännän en vielä,
kun vasta heräsin. Kuuntelen radiosta jotakin poliittista asiaohjelmaa
ulkomaista suomalaistens uulla ja mietin, miten suhtautuu
positiivisuus negatiivisuuteen: brasilialainen on positiivinen ja
kovin taitava, onnistuva, muttei voi yhtä hyvin, kun taas suomalainen
on negatiivinen, mesoaa valittaen epäkohdista mutta jotenkin päätyy
tervehenkisempään oloon, vaikka kai jää taitamattomammaksi kuin
Brasilia. Eli oiskohan tuo tervehenkisyys ololle tärkeä ja
elinoloille.

Atom bombs in Japan 1945

In the net news there was an old video filmed by the Russians right after the atom bombs in Hiroshima 6. August 1945 and Nagasaki 9th August 1945, it said: http://yle.fi/uutiset/japanissa_julkaistiin_salaiseksi_luokiteltu_filmi_nagasakista_ja_hiroshimasta_heti_ydinpommin_jalkeen__video/9076478 . There seemed to be pieces filmed by Russians, some Japanese woman and some Chinese. They did not seem worried about the destruction, they just thought so and so many killed and the Japanese woman was worried about the economical cost of ruining so many houses, especially a bank. But in the film there were destroyed factory of Mitsubishi and that had somehow very worrying looks, somehow wrong, wrong kind of work done, no wonder someone wanted to bomb it (thought the Japansese woman?), kind of calming, peaceful. So can it be that there was something wrong there in the work done and that still worries and not just the fact of a bomb killing?

What then would cure such dangers as atom bombs? Typically I have come to think that healthy ages old fracturelessness, like in Finland, would cure them to a large extend. I have tried to teach something of the Finnish culture at http://Finnishskills.blogspot.fi and maybe of that fractureless is the text about seasons, maybe, just maybe.

If the problem with the factory was either too hard working without enough freedom, see http://workandfreetime.blogspot.fi the book link and in Finnish about getting one's distant dearest dream job http://nopeaoppisuus.blogspot.fi .  Or then too idiotic workers keeping too much pressure on things or commanding, for that see my thinking course http://quickerlearning.blogspot.fi and the advices in developing in intelligence at http://www.youtube.com/khtervola and in Finnish http://pikakoulu.blogspot.fi . About moral I have written at http://healthilymoral.blogspot.fi . Idiotic command other when they mistake the others as more stupid than they are, so inform polite people of the danger of misunderstanding if they lie politely. Also my Finnish languager pikakoulu blog might help in describing what intelligence is like.

Are the dates wrong? I remember 4th August and 6th August and year around the same.

Robot busses are an idiotic idea

I read from the local newspaper that in Helsinki they will try a minibus without driver but with some person present just in case. Later on they would guide the car from a distance when needed. Just idiotic. A real driver can immediately react if there are any problems. Ordinary traffic rules demand that the driver must not do other things at the same time as driving or his/her reactions are too slow to prevent accidents. Just today in the new there was a lot about a lorry(?) in Nizza France having killed 84 by driving qith speed 2km on a crowded street. That is what all robot driven vehicöes can turn into. And if a computer driven car goes wrong way it is difficult to correct the error, much more difficult than in a car with a human driver. Besides a bus driver is doing his job: being active in a practical task with senses open, social and with an understanding of where he drives, where he is going to and what it is like in the bus for the passengers: a bus driver creates a good way to travel, prevents fights and crimes in the bus, helps people find their way and learn local customs.

Computer guided cars shouldn't be made

Cars driven by computer are dangerous. One can kidnap people with them and unmobilize them. Especially dangerous this is at times of war, especially at times of war covered with lies. I guess that Asians would be interested in such maneuvers. Especially stupid it is to change totally to computer aided cars, for example for environmental reasons. Manually working cars are by far the safest!

In the old times women were thought irrational and without a sense of space while men were good with maps and concretical observations and objective thinking. At those times men drove but women did not have a driver's lisence, they just sat without a proper sense of where they were going and a sense of distance, routes etc. Nowadays women too drive, almost all women have a driver's lisence in Finland and women also have a good clear head with good quality objective thinking, with no problem with maps and directions. In computer guided car all would be like passengers, so all would lose their objectively correct common sense. That is a major disaster, economically catastrophic tothe nation's economy.

Finland is not like Sweden

There is a problem in Finland of foreigners thinking that Finland is like Sweden. It isn't. The Swedish are extremely imago oriented and do not care if things are rotten underneath, at least not if it is toward other nations, for example toward Finland. Finns are realism oriented and value honesty that does not allow any darker side sunderneath. The Swedish follow their culture robot like while Finns value freedom and moral, a grass-roots democracy according to the rule "Live and let otehrs live" which means roughly that one is allowed to be free and selfish like is positive for happy life, but not to mess with the lives of others, except fairly to prevent them from messing unfairly with the lives of others. Finns also value a lot each person's own objective understanding like common sense with a picture of the whole and honest fact communication about wisdom of life and about the workings of a society and about other subjects.

Total freedom is still easy to control

The Finnish rule "Live and let others live", see http://finnishskills.blogspot.fi/2012/10/live-and-let-others-live.html , means roughly that one is allowed to live freely and be selfish but not to disturb the lives of others (except fairly to prevent them from disturbing unfairly the lives of others). It gives the individuals in a society as much freedom as it is theoretically possible to give all fairly, i.e. one can live completely freely but not disturb the lives of others, which latter is needed for the freedom of others and for good life in the society.
Such almost total freedom may sound like a mess that is difficult to handle, but it aren't. If people can choose freely the main elements in their lives, they are satisfied with such life and not continually running away or making things in disguise. Typically people in the capital district of Finland where this rule was followed, had one job that they had chosen, that they happaned to like, so they always went to the same job and liked that. But those younger generation people who had not had the possibility to choose themselves, were constantly searching for new better alternatives. In addition the people had maybe two or three hobbies that they had chosen conpletely freely and not for some social reason, and so they liked their hobbies and spent free time in them or at home. In addition they did things generally considered good in the society, like going for a holiday trip countryside in the summer. Sometimes closest relationships in addition demanded them along to some hobby of their, like if they needed a car. But that is quite clearly it all, not difficult to handle. But those who did not follow the rule "Live and let others live" were more in arguments and caused more like a mess.