Did 1940's make people stupid?

In the news it was that today is 75 years since the bomb of Hiroshima. The atom bomb was called "little boy". Since often engineers etc do not much believe in technology, even computers which seem capable of much, reoeat some simple task many times to produce for example pictures on the screen. But other areas of life appear complex and capable of much. So instead of just a bomb,an engineer knew that little boys do not know much and are not so skilled, it would cause a lot of damage and lot of stupidity to copy in such a central issue from little boys, and so they named the bomb so that it's name would cause destruction. The others would think school a good correction for such stupidity, but since likelily the boys and the very stupid were the most eager supportersof school studies, they ended up getting influences from boys and the very stupid also that way, and so the 1940's maybe made the world much more stupid.
I wonder if these are inföuecies that were not asked for for oneself but instead were meant to be subjects handled in the mnedia: how to get the boys and the very stupid to school, who were they who so much wanted to bomb by an atom bomb and what were the opinions of others and their skill levels. Often when one emphatizes with a very stupid persons,one gets drown in that perspective and cannot anymore grasp ordinary things of one's ordinary understanding, and so one is left in the stupid viewpoint which increase stupidity, for an overly long time.

I wonder if some towns have been bombed

Some 11 years ago I moved from the capital district of Finland to a countryside town in eastern Finland, and so it is quite natural that here there are less news from the capital district. Yet the last two new years have left a taste of possiblenuclearn war in the world, and the last January there was not all the time snow, which is very unusual in Finland,and I felt very tired. Some times in reading news I have wondered about the maps: USA withut Californian peninsula, Kopenhagen in denmark changed place and the pictures of Helsinki in Finland seem to have something wrong compared to the town I grew yup in. So I wonder if someone bombed them.
Helsinki is/was a very academically inclined town with healthy ways of living and healthy kind of wisdom of life that is very valuable for happy life and for things running well. As a capital it's culture has wisdom of how to get things work well in a democracy. As values freedom,nature, a good future, rationality, individuality, responsibility were important.
Yesterday I read from a newspaper that someone lives n Helsinki in a place whose name is a part of town in Tampere. There was in the radio an orthodox Christian liturgy from Helsinki, but I had never heard of such church and when I happened to listen to a  very short piece of it, it sounded unfamiliar, like not in Helsinki and Finland. I was born in Helsinki and lived there my youth, a little bit over 30 years.

* * *  

25th of November 2021 in Espoo

I do not know which towns or places have been bombed but my impression is that the most famous places that sound like big leaders in the world and of which one's social eye does not tell what they are like, would be the likeliest to get bombed. In addition very much attacking places, I would guess. 

About women power

As a woman I have been delighted to see that many women have excellent skills and dedication for their work. In the university female students were often smarter than men. But such often happens when one is not taking part in rigid ways but instead more freely uses skills from other areas of life, like often happens when one is not so much raised to the same role, to the same tasks, but instead comes from a different background with high skills in something similar but not the same. On the other hand I have not noticed power going to women via skills but instead more via looks and some social estimates that do not go right. One should not treat women as if women were martians and impossible to understand. Women's characteristics are shown in women's looks just the same way as men's characteristics in men's looks, but women are often very different from men, so guesswork is not ok. One should just demand professional skills and ¨good work ethic, and not confuse positions of power with sex affairs. Power is a society level thing, while sex is a thing at the level of social relationships, which of course are also parts of the society and ought to not to break against the common good. 

 

* * *

1st of December 2020    I copied this to my long text about the skills of Christmas gnomes. It is C69. there and there are some other texts there about similar subjects and some links too.

Skills of Christmas gnomes 1. Gnome like life in the modern world (Finland) http://learntalents.blogspot.com/2018/09/gnomes-or-more-likelily-doing-things-in.html
Skills of Christmas gnomes 2. Hero like skills   https://learntalents.blogspot.com/2020/01/some-observations-about-gnomes-and-like.html
Skills of Christmas gnomes 3. Tale like fascination in everyday real life    https://learntalents.blogspot.com/2020/02/some-additional-remarks-about-gnome.html
Skills of Christmas gnomes 4. Oath like love   https://learntalents.blogspot.com/2020/07/tale-like-things-in-everyday-life.html
Skills of Christmas gnomes 5. Gnomes from the religious point of view   http://learntalents.blogspot.com/2020/09/skills-of-christmas-gnomes-5-gnomes.html
The whole blog   http://learntalents.blogspot.com
  

2nd of December 2020   I have not been a boss. I am a thinker and a writer. I think that often when people fail in something, they make an error at a lower level of intelligence than their usual, and often that is an error about the mechanical basci grounds for complex things according to feelings. So I often write about such grounds, yet thinking that the readers ought to understand the whole thing at a more complex level, in wiser ways too.

About foreign interests

If a place is small and foreign interests many and mighty, there comes the question how to arrange things. Generally then one has to pay attantion to the different interest groups, to what they need, and in civiliced ways arrange such things on one's own behalf for those groups separately or if works well as some bunches, and especially for one's own groups. That means that one must maybe arrange such things also elsewhere, support some other groups whiuch arramge such, often abroad and in different professions etc. For example all material like suits one's own group in civiliced ways, but having specific occasions in which the other groups are taken tinto account. And if they ask for something else, refer that to the groups which arrange such, poften abroad, like for example travel is different from actors introducing basic areas of life in their own coutrnry, and documents telling of them in reality.

About nuclear bombs

Was it yesterday I was reading the locel newspaper and it mentioned cooperation with near areas in Russia using the name "Leningrad Oblast" and I was left wondering if it was the old name of the area and had it been bombed by an atom bomb and when, was it in the 1980's? An atom bomb seems to be a different things from a murder in the media, which raises the person to our attention while an atom bomb in a town kind of erases such place away, since people think that maybe some foreigners thought such was on a troo big emphazis, had too big influence in the wolrd, could not carry it, and so the people near by keep quiet more than usual. Like a year ago after the new year was so quiet as if Stockholm in Sweden had been bombed and all at lost what think and say, if say anything at all. But I wonder if it is at all the longed for influence in the world  that causes such, is it more likely that it is some side effect which often comes along with the influence, but which maybe rthey themselves cannot carry so well, but still they are among the most wanted influencies, I guess best or most oriented toward such things. But it does not leave a taste of traditional warfare, more like erasing from one's picture of the world such striking source of influence, to which a media silence and no influencies from places with close tiesa to such culture and ways, maybe valuyes, would be better suited.

Danger of world war

I have been unlucky lately, as if death were nearing in the next few days, but I have not known why. But today I looked at the news in the internet and there was about danger of war between USA and Iran, but the picture of the text was dark: all black wiht just some soruce of light, like a danger world war. What can one do to prevent a world war, a nuclear war? Ordinary life for the last decades has been without war, especially without world war, so ordinary life is one option that one can follow. But of course some things like fighting, misfortyunes and too strongly said opinoons may be dangerous, likewise malicioursness. I have some texts which might help something in this:
http://Finnishskills.blogspot.com
http://healthilymoral.blogspot.com
some of the links of the text http://learntalents.blogspot.com/2018/09/gnomes-or-more-likelily-doing-things-in.html

Reading about Mahatma Gandhi

I read beginning from a book about Mahatma Gandhi's writings, in Finnish.
It has a quotation: "There is no road to peace. Oeace is the roiad." Upon the well functioning you can builkd future life. If something is not ok, you cannot build ok situation upon it. If you see in it parts that are ok, things well, then you can build upon such and achieve a much better situation.
I propably had heard but had not quite registered that Gandhi first influenced in South Africa. This far I have read only the first spoeach and it seemed to be from a situation where Asian culture had a rigid theory perspective that Asians found easy to follow, which is connected to them thinking not so well but anyway somewhat and having much more skilled Asian forefigures that can offer thoughts to follow, while the Africans and those Asians who had moved to live in Africa wanted to have more basic life with social considerations and freedom and common sense's view dominant, and so he talked about rigid rules causing åroblems in marriages and freedomoffering road to common sense and well working social life.So it was a South African view to life that he supported. I wonder if present day Indians have failed to notice that difference and just copied a peculiar maybe well working approach? But I guess that Asians would need more climate skills and skills in the art of living instead of African influence.
Can nonviolence be a question of larger areas of influence via international trade, media and larger nations with easy transport?You kind of mix with the daily life, with the well working society of far away places. So you get a mass of theory perspectives of how to run a society and how to arrange your way of life, and  also the ways different professions live may vary much more. So there isn't a border and calshes there between different ways of living the daily life and different values, and good will inside the area with the same likings and values, with some getting killed on the border or upon not liking the local values.

* * *
My thinking course at http://quickerlearning.blogspot.com teaches good qualitu common sense like objective thinking that is good for just about all things that need thinking.

For learning climate skills moving in varied ways is good. It does not need to be much, already a few meters quickly like suits the sporty wishes of the moment and in a way that varies accoring to the situation: mood, ground, heat regulation, how near one is the beginning or end, what is a good way to run, etc, without social intentions but with good will like liking hobbies. That already teaches tuning to environmental conditions and to the state of one'sbody, the effect of one's mood, of different company, tiredness, future plans etc
Moving teaches also skills in the art of living but that almost demands a sports hobby in which one moves in varied ways, reactively, aiming for learning skills of moving and loving the practiucalö healthy life, since in moving there are mony things to take into account liuke in life, but in moving those are in a concretical form and without much social pressure.

* * *

21.10.2019   Did factory made products make markets much wider so that the size of societies grew a lot, and to that was needed a well running theory perspective that would leave room for the traditional local cultures, to which maybe European British perspective was good and an European was an outsider so they were automatically without much influence in local affairs and local culture, more like the person just carrying some theory perspective that was good for a wider market, maybe the task was somehow similar to meeting the demands of a climate of four seasons, in which you need a picture of the whole year and expectation for different types of predictable seasons. When the Indians had learned such thinking & perspective themselves, the British were no longer needed. Well, just a guess..