The last few days I have followed US elections from the news and have not understood much, so that I have been kind of puzzled and bothered with the fuss, but a few things I have come to think about. Is one question whether medicine helps people or disturbs their lives? The very skilled, like many people learn needed skills as they become older, often have also own skills about healing, and so a young medicine practitioner or an older one who for some reason is still on that level which relies on schooling and does not have own skills to estimate things better, those just disturb the healing of the skilled. While a young person without much such skills but with a wish to follow healthy ways of living, might naturally benefit froma wound being sewn closed, from medicine mildening inflammation, etc. And I guess then there are in addition people without healthy ways of living, who do not get cured so well. And the problem is that as people get older, fewer recognize their real skill levels and so the very skilled (often via age, and that means many) and the not at all skilled get mixed in the eyes of the school level ratyionality and some mischievous or enemy like of them try to prevent healthy ways of living from the skilled and from the old, so as to gain position for school anbd education. But of course an understanding of one's own is also needed, and that is why the very skilled are valuable to others too, valuable to the just educated too.
(My views about curing http://curingguesses.blogspot.com
http://parantamisesta.blogspot.com )
* * *
30th of November 2020 I live in Finland in North-East Europe in a countryside town with an opera festival in the summer time. At least here the difference between investing in education and on the other hand trusting the wisdom of the elderly and arts and maybe religion too, seems to be close what this town meets via tourism, raising the kids,people wanting to learn arts, etc. Generally people whose understanding isn't so good value education, while people who are educated value more own common sense, arts and a wider view of the world, wisdom of life too. In education one studies among other things also thinking skills, and so in the teaching material the chains of thought are clearly told, while after education one still demands rationality, also basic ratiuonality, but often is more interested in the subjects themselves and in practical things and so many times the chains of thought are left for the readers to think through by themselves and not marked so clearly, but there are very many of them. To discern between the skilled and the uneducated, one ought to ask for such grounds but not demand a different way of writing usually, but since it is a higher level of skill, one ought to use very good quality rationality oneself when asking for clearer grounds.
"E39. 30th of November 2020 In following the presidental elections of
USA I did not understand much. But is it so that one party wants things
according to education, while the other says that people do not in
practice make choices so and that needs to be taken into account which
then causes more like a mess. In the University of Helsinki, Finland,
where I studied as a young adult, it was thought that educatyion needs
as it's support a wider view of the world, often theoretical in the
light of wisdom of life and with the ages old healthy natural ways of
living giving a picture of humans via which one can understand a lot and
offer happy life in practice, well working solutions too. Via wisdom of
life one finds answers that are good for others to use, and so the
solutions work out better, and the biological picture of humans is at so
theoretically wide level that it can build a bridge between different
types of humans and even animals, so that one does not create a mess but
instead easy naturally working solutions. "
http://learntalents.blogspot.com
