In the news here in Finland there is lots of knife attacks in Turku. Some pictures show people who look like actors as passers by and many people involved appear African, Asian or the like. So is the question what to do with such happenings in their own countries? First of all, all do not want to remove such crimes. If there is some unseen big crime, some want things like that better at sight, in public places. Also if some think in clumsy ways, tey end up in lots of collisions with others, and so they think that real rationality and realism demand roughly such a number of conflicts. So in Africa people like conflicts more and in Europe with the tendency to follow complex society structure all the time in everything, there isn't such clumsiness in views and so people are satisfied with more finely tuned cooperation in society. If one wants to cure those African problems away, one should value the sense of sight, kind of laying groundwork for better understanding, for a landscape like view.
What then would be such unseen crime in Finland. There are the foreigners, many of whom are ina continuous flu and with a very negative mind because of the cold. Some may even be cannibas because the nearly arctic climate does not go well by food only. Then there are professions like medicare, psychology, school etc where there are as workers foreigners who havenät gone to school in Finnish amounts, and so those jobs go ashtray. Also the lack of schooling of adults forces children to school even if the children had a good enough head to study better on their own, which is a crime since Finnish children often have good heads.
If one wants to learn Finnish cultural wisdom that would be useful also in other countries, one should read my blog http://Finnishskills.blogspot.fi , especially the points marked important in the header, but if in cool or cold climate, then also the parts about Finnish climate which also somehow explain the national character, are a reason for it.
tiistai 22. elokuuta 2017
sunnuntai 20. elokuuta 2017
Square or a ball
Some people think that square forms connect to objective thinking, while round forms not. But that is not so. Those impressions come mainly from social style. One following rules is like following some line or square forms, while a successfull skilled person typically has round satisfied forms. These are two different skil levels. Round is difficult also if you mix it with some food, especially if the food isn't especially well made. Well made food refers to skills in a way and can affect one's being toward better for action and more healthy, which is already in the direction of skills. But round where it typically connects with skills is like in the curves of the branches of bushes and trees or in a twinding path: fromone situation you see clearly how it develps to a new one, even if it is a complex thing to conceive. With high skillone alsonotices motivational factors and how feelings connect to them,so slight curves, sometimes bigger ones too, are typical to the rythms of action perceived with all one's perception ability,also social eye, atmospheres, sight, movement, etc
A ball is along the same direction as round forms but a different things, since it is a fixed shape that often comes because some nations have a ball in their flag, kind of piece of the vocabulary there and symbolizes propably many valuable things. A ball is different also in it's unifiedness, in a way it is a model of a healthy strong whole which is also healthily according to feelings and happy. So it is a basic model of how things should be, but the grounds are complex and demand for example an understanding of the nature of health and naturality and of how feelings connect to those. It also comes better via understanding several size classes and not just oen at a time.
From the usefulness of round forms it is clear that too fixed rythms like in strainght lines or too arupt changes of phase like in square forms are not good for action and not good for thinking either, do not bring as much understanding. On the other hand square forms are handy in building, since one can lay square blocks of different sizes and materials next to eaxh other and get an unified structure, for example a house. But in building work it is also so that buildings are meant for certain use, so the comfortable spaces as sensed are a good model of how to build and not some measures in centimeters or so.
A ball is along the same direction as round forms but a different things, since it is a fixed shape that often comes because some nations have a ball in their flag, kind of piece of the vocabulary there and symbolizes propably many valuable things. A ball is different also in it's unifiedness, in a way it is a model of a healthy strong whole which is also healthily according to feelings and happy. So it is a basic model of how things should be, but the grounds are complex and demand for example an understanding of the nature of health and naturality and of how feelings connect to those. It also comes better via understanding several size classes and not just oen at a time.
From the usefulness of round forms it is clear that too fixed rythms like in strainght lines or too arupt changes of phase like in square forms are not good for action and not good for thinking either, do not bring as much understanding. On the other hand square forms are handy in building, since one can lay square blocks of different sizes and materials next to eaxh other and get an unified structure, for example a house. But in building work it is also so that buildings are meant for certain use, so the comfortable spaces as sensed are a good model of how to build and not some measures in centimeters or so.
sunnuntai 6. elokuuta 2017
About real media professionals
In the local newspaper Itä-Savo of Savonlinna town where I live, there was today a 3 page article of an Elvis fan and fine pictures of his room which was museo like, Elvius pictures on walls, really magnifient looking and atmosheric, full of feeling, and a large tv with Elvis video playing in it, really finely kept and the man looking as if it were his big dream. Kind of warmed the heart to see such big dreams. But I only later came to think that in the 1990's when I used to listent o the radio a lot, I was in the capital then, the radio dj's etc were music fans of such a caliber, so convinced of music that they played in their radio programs. So they were with their whole way of life finding a way for the radio audience to find such marvels in music too. They with their enthusiasm and expert knowledge about music building a road for the music to be a very beneficial part of the daily lives. Likewise of other types of radio programs, the people making them must have been living such lives, being able to inrtoduce them to many kinds of radio listeners, build a road for them too having such things in their lives, like a hobby teacher does in a hobby group. But later as I have listened same kind of radio stations, there have been much less good speakers and dj's in them, kind of thinking that I can this job, so I will do it, so they play just some music, demanding the music to carry their program and not as if they had any insight why such music exists, how it lifts the day, much less having such insight in a positive way for large audiences. And some speakers sound like actors, not making a road to having those things in life, merely making a disguise for not the right persons being there in the radio, and such is disastrous for the usefullness of radio programs to their listeners. Fpreigners thinking such things of media, can it be that in many foreign countries they make the same errors as quite many radio stations in Finland/Savonlinna area nowadays?
Tilaa:
Blogitekstit (Atom)