Different tasks should be kept separate

I have heard impossible sounding news that the post would also take care of fallen leaves in gardens, maybe even of watering flowers in homes. Formerly post only delivered ordinary post and early morning newspapers on some areas. Now there has been news also that post would stop coming 5 days a week, which must be a consequence of it taking wring tasks - like in Africa or where? Today there was an even more absurd piece of news about the post: it said that some woman from the post would take an old man for a walk after he had had a medical operation. Well, that is clearly different from delivering post!
Maybe in some countries postmen are considered very trustworthy while others are not, so they kind of lay all kinds of burdens on the postmen. But one shouldn't do so at all. Post is important, it brings safety because it is an outsider, a very neutral and morally ok person passing by, without stopping, without messing with local affairs, without being possible to confuse a criminal with post. All these changes make post like a criminal from the worse end of the spctrum. So these tasks should not be classified as postmen but as the major influence that they give possibility to. Like walking with an old man is different from claiming that he should go to surgery and that one has the medical eye to claim so, is not postman, it is a nurse from the hospital taking an old man for a walk. Or then it is some private medical service that has been oblidghed to not to interfere with whether one goes to medicare or not, while the old man himself has the freedom to choose according to his wishes, but it is not post. Post lurking around is not ok, gardener taking care of garden is ok if there are no other obscure businesses and it has been agreed with those who live there. Watering flowers belongs to trustworthy neighbours, or one can give the flowers for someone to care during holiday, or keep them in the garden in half-shadow and rain.

Relatives are too different for the same job

There was this unheard of piece of news that a new minister is going to supervise a ministry in which his sister has been working for tens of years and is a big boss. "For 50 years she has been bossing me, now I am going to boss her.", said the new minister.
If you go to some place and ask the road, maybe 1/3 or 1/5 of the passers by are such somehow that you would ask just them, and get a good enough answer. Yet that is your idea of meeting just about anybody without some piucking of a certain group. And the place that you were in was somehow connected to what your kind of persons might visit. So you are in fact associating with an even more narrow group. Likewise most of your aquantages value some certain professions, have thie r ways, style, certain values, way of being social, belonging to the society and groups.
But your sister or brother was not chosen that way at all. Ahe/he is along for other reasons, because of being relatives, so she/he is furthest away from what you and your environment is like. So when you are clishee like considered socially close and alike, you on the other hand tend to question her/his choises and ways and on the other hand try to pick points in those areas of life that she/he is interested in but you aren't, which often leads to trying to erase those things from the list of valued things in life and in the world and trying to erase that person's influence too and her/his place in the world.
So if yoru sister/brother has been sincerely interested in some area of life for tens of yoears and working on it too good quality, bossing you too, it is no plcae for you to try to pick points and dominate on those areas of life too, for example in her/his work. Just let different types of people live their lives in their righteous places in the world and just keep distance, more distance than to anyone else you know.

World trade center towers attacks in USA 15 years ago

15 years ago airoplanes collided with the World trade cebter twin towers in usa on 11th of September.
I haven't reacted so much to that news, I do not know much about it.
But I read that there must have been bombs planted in the buildings for them to collapse like that. That sounds like a suicide. The reason would have been unbearable working conditions, too much working time and too little free time according to likings. I have tried to cure such: http://workandfreetime.blogspot.fi and especially the book there, and in Finnish http://nopeaoppisuus.blogspot.fi , maybe also http://pikakoulu.blogspot.fi .
There were several towers. Twin towers would have been an interest for gays, so there is much more likely to be problems with unbearable working conditions there. And a some kind of increased tendency for confliucts somewhat like warring.

I have not felt my sevurity so much shattered by that, because I feel that with civilized ways dominant and not so much social eye, people from other cultures with less moral can more easily enter the country, since they do not get shot, so with a country with some foreign sabotagers around and with a mixture of cultural backgrounds giving different strategies of life, which at least part of the time want to compete and some do not do it so wisely, there ought to be some sabotagers available at the area. So if someone more civilized wants helpers in a task like that, maybe it goes quite easily, and the civlized one would understand the workings of the place. So having groups that are integrated strongly with the society dissatisfied may cause such even if they themselves do not bomb anyone.
About intergrating immigrants, maybe my blog http://Finnishskills.blogspot.fi could help, also in usa.

Terrorism and a solution

I read from the news that there have been by far most terrorist acts in Near East & North Africa (Arabs) and in South Asia. In South Asia and Africa the attacks have targeted on civilians, which sounds like the bombers wanted to complain about some cultural characteristic, about some quite common opinion in the society, about what people in practise support and why, meaning that they support something unwise.
Other targets were classified army which sounds like something like war business, government which sounds like they were somehow to stiff and mistaken, some fault in the government, and then companies which sounds like they had international business which affected wrong way over cultural borders.
To all these, I guess the Finnish problem solving method referred by the nonliteral words "Live and let others öive" would help, see http://finnishskills.blogspot.fi/2012/10/live-and-let-others-live.html . It makes people's behavious acceptaböle, by setting borders to how much they can affect and by allowing people to live freely without disturbing others. So it could solve the cultuyral problems. If it would be accepted as the highest rule in government, it would make government acceptable if applied wisely and with wisdom of life. It also settles disputes between countires, so it could calm down military situations to more peaceful yet having armies. And it would set borders to international companies' behaviour, making them acceptable.

Suomalaisesta versus ulkomaalaisesta lähestymistavasta

Brasilian
kesäolympialaisia silloin tällöin telkusta katselen, tännän en vielä,
kun vasta heräsin. Kuuntelen radiosta jotakin poliittista asiaohjelmaa
ulkomaista suomalaistens uulla ja mietin, miten suhtautuu
positiivisuus negatiivisuuteen: brasilialainen on positiivinen ja
kovin taitava, onnistuva, muttei voi yhtä hyvin, kun taas suomalainen
on negatiivinen, mesoaa valittaen epäkohdista mutta jotenkin päätyy
tervehenkisempään oloon, vaikka kai jää taitamattomammaksi kuin
Brasilia. Eli oiskohan tuo tervehenkisyys ololle tärkeä ja
elinoloille.

Atom bombs in Japan 1945

In the net news there was an old video filmed by the Russians right after the atom bombs in Hiroshima 6. August 1945 and Nagasaki 9th August 1945, it said: http://yle.fi/uutiset/japanissa_julkaistiin_salaiseksi_luokiteltu_filmi_nagasakista_ja_hiroshimasta_heti_ydinpommin_jalkeen__video/9076478 . There seemed to be pieces filmed by Russians, some Japanese woman and some Chinese. They did not seem worried about the destruction, they just thought so and so many killed and the Japanese woman was worried about the economical cost of ruining so many houses, especially a bank. But in the film there were destroyed factory of Mitsubishi and that had somehow very worrying looks, somehow wrong, wrong kind of work done, no wonder someone wanted to bomb it (thought the Japansese woman?), kind of calming, peaceful. So can it be that there was something wrong there in the work done and that still worries and not just the fact of a bomb killing?

What then would cure such dangers as atom bombs? Typically I have come to think that healthy ages old fracturelessness, like in Finland, would cure them to a large extend. I have tried to teach something of the Finnish culture at http://Finnishskills.blogspot.fi and maybe of that fractureless is the text about seasons, maybe, just maybe.

If the problem with the factory was either too hard working without enough freedom, see http://workandfreetime.blogspot.fi the book link and in Finnish about getting one's distant dearest dream job http://nopeaoppisuus.blogspot.fi .  Or then too idiotic workers keeping too much pressure on things or commanding, for that see my thinking course http://quickerlearning.blogspot.fi and the advices in developing in intelligence at http://www.youtube.com/khtervola and in Finnish http://pikakoulu.blogspot.fi . About moral I have written at http://healthilymoral.blogspot.fi . Idiotic command other when they mistake the others as more stupid than they are, so inform polite people of the danger of misunderstanding if they lie politely. Also my Finnish languager pikakoulu blog might help in describing what intelligence is like.

Are the dates wrong? I remember 4th August and 6th August and year around the same.

Robot busses are an idiotic idea

I read from the local newspaper that in Helsinki they will try a minibus without driver but with some person present just in case. Later on they would guide the car from a distance when needed. Just idiotic. A real driver can immediately react if there are any problems. Ordinary traffic rules demand that the driver must not do other things at the same time as driving or his/her reactions are too slow to prevent accidents. Just today in the new there was a lot about a lorry(?) in Nizza France having killed 84 by driving qith speed 2km on a crowded street. That is what all robot driven vehicöes can turn into. And if a computer driven car goes wrong way it is difficult to correct the error, much more difficult than in a car with a human driver. Besides a bus driver is doing his job: being active in a practical task with senses open, social and with an understanding of where he drives, where he is going to and what it is like in the bus for the passengers: a bus driver creates a good way to travel, prevents fights and crimes in the bus, helps people find their way and learn local customs.

Computer guided cars shouldn't be made

Cars driven by computer are dangerous. One can kidnap people with them and unmobilize them. Especially dangerous this is at times of war, especially at times of war covered with lies. I guess that Asians would be interested in such maneuvers. Especially stupid it is to change totally to computer aided cars, for example for environmental reasons. Manually working cars are by far the safest!

In the old times women were thought irrational and without a sense of space while men were good with maps and concretical observations and objective thinking. At those times men drove but women did not have a driver's lisence, they just sat without a proper sense of where they were going and a sense of distance, routes etc. Nowadays women too drive, almost all women have a driver's lisence in Finland and women also have a good clear head with good quality objective thinking, with no problem with maps and directions. In computer guided car all would be like passengers, so all would lose their objectively correct common sense. That is a major disaster, economically catastrophic tothe nation's economy.

Finland is not like Sweden

There is a problem in Finland of foreigners thinking that Finland is like Sweden. It isn't. The Swedish are extremely imago oriented and do not care if things are rotten underneath, at least not if it is toward other nations, for example toward Finland. Finns are realism oriented and value honesty that does not allow any darker side sunderneath. The Swedish follow their culture robot like while Finns value freedom and moral, a grass-roots democracy according to the rule "Live and let otehrs live" which means roughly that one is allowed to be free and selfish like is positive for happy life, but not to mess with the lives of others, except fairly to prevent them from messing unfairly with the lives of others. Finns also value a lot each person's own objective understanding like common sense with a picture of the whole and honest fact communication about wisdom of life and about the workings of a society and about other subjects.

Total freedom is still easy to control

The Finnish rule "Live and let others live", see http://finnishskills.blogspot.fi/2012/10/live-and-let-others-live.html , means roughly that one is allowed to live freely and be selfish but not to disturb the lives of others (except fairly to prevent them from disturbing unfairly the lives of others). It gives the individuals in a society as much freedom as it is theoretically possible to give all fairly, i.e. one can live completely freely but not disturb the lives of others, which latter is needed for the freedom of others and for good life in the society.
Such almost total freedom may sound like a mess that is difficult to handle, but it aren't. If people can choose freely the main elements in their lives, they are satisfied with such life and not continually running away or making things in disguise. Typically people in the capital district of Finland where this rule was followed, had one job that they had chosen, that they happaned to like, so they always went to the same job and liked that. But those younger generation people who had not had the possibility to choose themselves, were constantly searching for new better alternatives. In addition the people had maybe two or three hobbies that they had chosen conpletely freely and not for some social reason, and so they liked their hobbies and spent free time in them or at home. In addition they did things generally considered good in the society, like going for a holiday trip countryside in the summer. Sometimes closest relationships in addition demanded them along to some hobby of their, like if they needed a car. But that is quite clearly it all, not difficult to handle. But those who did not follow the rule "Live and let others live" were more in arguments and caused more like a mess.

Who decides matters of major interest

It seems to me that each culture has it's own perspective and it's own major points that it considers it's own area or very important in the world, like sauna for Finland or the military defence of the Finnish Bay. It seems like a miracle that not so many in the workld are so interested in these matters, so it is much easier to have an opinion about them, to influence them like we dearly need. Even bigger miracle it is that if we take a look at some Wedish text about some familiar subject, it uses typically somewhat different concepts, somewhat different values and is overly interested in things connected with Sweden. So we feel somewhat alienated and think that let the Swedes decide Swedish things and let us have all these important Finnish things, let us Finns decide about them fully, so we will have well all the major matters of our world. And since other countires and their cultures are propably much further away from our own, maybe we are the ones that rule the world in these matters - partly bacause we tend to think with an objective picture of the whole world and morally too. Is it so that each culture "rules the world" in it's major questions if it does not intentionally tie them to the major interests of others (that is just some landscape that the culture happens to lives in)?!

Jewish hat: who one listens to

I heard in the news that in some European country a Jewish teacher had been strongly critisised by the pupils who were non-Jewish, about the teacher wanting to wear a Jewish hat in school. I would agree with the pupils. As far as I know Jews value school and academical education overly much, to a degree which is not wise and which is very harmful for the quality of life and for the rights of individuals. So an overly pressuring teacher might want to wear a Jewish hat to show his extreme views. But wearing a such a hat is a question to which group one belongs to and whom one listens to. In school the teacher should belong to same group as the pupils, so as to listent o them, to make life good for them, to respoect their rights and their understanding, to heed their values, to be sensitive, to discuss with just them - and not only with some group not present, some group having strong unhuman views about education, some group not understanding that the teacher does not behave in civilized ways toward the students from another culture but with the ways of a stupid person who follows advices without regard for the true consequences, like a person who does not understand that other cultures have wisdom, that already the pupils have wisdom of another culture and an understanding of their own.

About masses of immigrants in different countries

In Europe there are many new immigrants, say the news. I just saw in tv a part of a citizen group in Finland discussing new immigrants in their own area. That made me think of how immigrant problems are met different ways in different countries around the world and how that creates a large part of the ways in the countries.
One key is how arranged public discussions treat the subject, what ideas and views they seize, what answers they give and how skilled the people feel to be.
One major problem seemed to be lazy people stuck to habits with no sports ability being nervous about needing to aggressively defend the locals against gangs of foreign men. One suggested answer was secret police or calling police, but if one thinks that from the point of view of citizens seizing such answers, relying in them when they fear the unknown or something especially, that brings a police state like view,police state like dynamics, which have the problem of too much forcing, which is bad for rights of individuals and groups and not good for peace and harmony.
Often it is good if one has several strategies to rely on, so one can have police and secret service too but making too much emphazis on them is kind of clumsy because in reality you have all the people in the society living, discussing, feelings, reacting, forming bonds, learning about cultures and ways etc.
Typically in conflict it isn't good if you overdo it, and neither it is good if you underestimate your chances of affecting things. What is healthy in life in general is often good in conflict but not good if you are manipulated, spied or the like which is a problem to be treated and not just some side issue to be bypassed. The biggest matters in the socviety are typically what life is like to live in, what side effects and major effewcts things and choises have. It is good to discuss these human to human and in groups, read papers etc. And to choose wisely! Wise choise often defends but is liberal in allowing people space to live in.
Defending is good to have many tactics in the sma eytime. Like if you need to defend the community, you can discuss, you can be agile enough to defend your home, you can introduce ways that are good both for the locals and for the newcomers. You can tell about your country, since many things are often wise choises in the climate and geographical location of the culture, kind of unavoidable like the need for different professions.

Nuclear bomb test

I just glanced the news and noticed that North Korea has made a
nuclear test of high caliber. That made me think of physicists who
plan such weapons. That is an area of objective thinking but hard work
which makes one wonder if they long for better life but see it far
away - too far for the whole globe? But according to the theory of
evolution humans are products of natural evolution which shaped us for
best capacity and shaped us to be satisfied with that kind of life, so
that happiness and best working condition are different sides of the
same kind of life, of natural healthy ways of living. For more in this
please see my free e-book http://www.angelfire.com/planet/paradisewins/TPBCASAW.pdf .
You might also be interested in Curing future threath scenarios
http://paratiisiteoria.blogspot.fi/2013/09/paratiisissa-on-kaarme.html